Wright v. Hatchett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Wright v. Hatchett

12 Ill. App. 261, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 186

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 16, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 Ill. App. 261 (Wright v. Hatchett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wright v. Hatchett, 12 Ill. App. 261, 1882 Ill. App. LEXIS 186 (Ill. Ct. App. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The court below overruled appellant’s motion to dismiss the suit, and sustained a motion by appellee to dismiss the appeal from the justice of the peace. Both of these rulings are assigned for error by appellant.

The bill of exceptions shows that the motion to dismiss the suit was founded upon an affidavit, which is not copied into the bill of exceptions, and is therefore no part of the record in this cause. Without the affidavit before us we can not say that the court erred in refusing to dismiss the suit.

The grounds for dismissing the appeal are not disclosed by the bill of exceptions, and nothing appearing to the contrary, we must presume they were sufficient to justify the action of the court in dismissing the appeal: Casey v. Honey, 14 Ill. 45; Bulger v. Hoffman, 45 Ill. 352; Buettner v. Manufacturing Co. 90 Ill. 415.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI