Bulger v. Hoffman

45 Ill. 352
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

There is no bill of exceptions appearing in this record, and, in its absence, we must presume the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with some proper rule or order of the court. It is impossible for this court, on what appears, to say why the appeal was dismissed. Appellant should have preserved the point by a bill of exceptions. The act of the legislature (§ 7, of Laws 1857), applies, in terms, to appeals from an inferior court, and authorizes their dismissal if an affidavit of merits be not filed before the expiration of the rule to plead, as in other cases.

We must presume such a rule was entered, which was not complied with.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bulger v. Hoffman, 45 Ill. 352 (Ill. 1867).

45 Ill. 352 (Bulger v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lanyon v. Michigan Buggy Co.
94 Ill. App. 243 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
City of Chicago v. Porter
16 N.E. 854 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1888)
Wright v. Hatchett
12 Ill. App. 261 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1883)
Blair v. Ray
103 Ill. 615 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1882)