Wright v. Di Milia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wright v. Di Milia

236 A.D. 807

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, requiring defendants to give the particulars demanded, or if they are not in possession of such particulars, to so state and likewise to state that they intend to rely upon the testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses on the issue of contributory negligence. (Dunson v. Kirtland, 235 App. Div. 854.) The particulars, or the statement in lieu thereof, shall be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, requiring defendants to give the particulars demanded, or if they are not in possession of such particulars, to so state and likewise to state that they intend to rely upon the testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses on the issue of contributory negligence. (Dunson v. Kirtland, 235 App. Div. 854.) The particulars, or the statement in lieu thereof, shall be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Wright v. Di Milia, 236 A.D. 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

236 A.D. 807 (Wright v. Di Milia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related