Dunson v. Kirtland

235 A.D. 854
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Order directing defendant to serve a bill of particulars modified by requiring the defendant to give the particulars asked for, or, if he is not in possession of such particulars, to so state and likewise to state that he intends to rely upon the testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses on the issue of contributory negligence. As thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs. (Cousens v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 232 App. Div. 821; Whitman v. Gowanus Towing Co., Inc., 231 id. 765; Burns v. City of New York, 226 id. 874; Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron Works, 159 id. 578.) The particulars, or the statement herein indicated, shall be served on plaintiff’s attorney within five days from the date of entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dunson v. Kirtland, 235 A.D. 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 854 (Dunson v. Kirtland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knibestol v. Perez
37 A.D.2d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Hayhurst v. O'Rourke
17 Misc. 2d 530 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Anton v. Boal
270 A.D. 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
Murrain v. Wilson Line, Inc.
266 A.D. 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Rochford v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
179 Misc. 231 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
Heddy v. Dairymen's League Co-Operative Ass'n
242 A.D. 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Wright v. Di Milia
236 A.D. 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)