Wright v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 26, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-02422
StatusUnknown

This text of Wright v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc (Wright v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

nen nnn nen en een ne nn nn ne EN OI EI

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on FILED MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Jan 26, 2022 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., ASR HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2197

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —323)

On December 3, 2010, the Panel transferred 7 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 753 F.Supp.2d 1378 (J.P.M.L. 2010). Since that time, 1,493 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Jeffrey J. Helmick. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Helmick. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 3, 2010, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Jeffrey J. Helmick. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

; Solon FOR THE PANEL: pending a this me, he ° Lys stay is lifted. ~U Jan 21, 2022 ( CLERK'S OFFICE ee John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel

| hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio _ By: /s/Robert Pitts oy Deputy Clerk oe 3

nnn nn en en een ne nn nn nn en EO EI I

IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., ASR HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2197

SCHEDULE CTO-323 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 2102422 Wright et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
753 F. Supp. 2d 1378 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wright v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-depuy-orthopaedics-inc-caed-2022.