Wright v. City of Pine Lawn

320 S.W.3d 205, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185, 2010 WL 3477497
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 2010·No. ED 94290·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

City of Pine Lawn, Missouri (City) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment granting Janet and Adrian Wright’s Motion for Summary Judgment on their challenge as taxpayers to a City ordinance as a violation of the Hancock Amendment. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the circuit court did not err in entering summary judgment in favor of the taxpayers. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. Mo. Const. Art. X, §§ 16-24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wright v. City of Pine Lawn, 320 S.W.3d 205, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185, 2010 WL 3477497 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 205 (Wright v. City of Pine Lawn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. State
320 S.W.3d 205 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)