Wright v. Centurion Investigations, Inc.
This text of 113 Misc. 2d 150 (Wright v. Centurion Investigations, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order insofar as appealed from reversed, without costs, and motion denied.
The plaintiff’s consent was not necessary in order for the defendants to withdraw their demand for a jury trial (CPLR 4102, subds [a], [c]; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, pars 4102.05, 4102.15,4102.18). We incidentally note that under the facts herein the plaintiff was not entitled to file a jury demand nunc pro tune pursuant to CPLR 4102 (subd [e]) (see Fils v Diener, 59 AD2d 522; see, also, Brigando v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 AD2d 865).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 Misc. 2d 150, 450 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-centurion-investigations-inc-nyappterm-1982.