Wright, Tracy v. Joshua Cooper d/b/a J&K Improvements

2021 TN WC 160
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMarch 9, 2021
Docket2019-04-0270
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 TN WC 160 (Wright, Tracy v. Joshua Cooper d/b/a J&K Improvements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wright, Tracy v. Joshua Cooper d/b/a J&K Improvements, 2021 TN WC 160 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2021).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT COOKEVILLE TRACY WRIGHT, ) Docket No. 2019-04-0270 Employee, ) v. ) State File No. 66044-2020 JOSHUA COOPER, d/b/a ) J&K IMPROVEMENTS, ) Judge Robert Durham

Uninsured Employer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS (Decision on the Record)

This case came before the Court for an expedited hearing. After the parties’ agreement to accept a decision on the record, the Court issued a Docketing Notice that required responses by March 4. The issues are whether Mr. Wright provided sufficient evidence to establish a compensation rate for entitlement to temporary total disability benefits and whether Mr. Cooper’s wife, Kylie Cooper, is a partner in J&K Improvements, and thus also liable to Mr. Wright. The Court holds that the evidence supports an award of temporary disability at a compensation rate of $419.91, but only from August 29 through October 8, 2020. Further, the proof does not establish Mts. Cooper’s liability to Mr. Wright for workers’ compensation benefits.

History of Claim

The Court previously held an expedited hearing on January 19, 2021, to determine whether Mr. Cooper is obligated to provide Mr. Wright medical and temporary disability benefits for a work-related left-foot fracture. The evidence presented at that hearing, as well as the Court’s findings, are incorporated by reference.

During that hearing, Mr. Cooper testified that as the sole proprietor of J&K Improvements, Mrs. Cooper did not have any ownership. Mr. Wright did not object to this representation or provide any evidence to the contrary. Further, the Uninsured Employer Investigation Report did not identify Mrs. Cooper as Mr. Cooper’s partner in J&K Improvements. As for temporary disability benefits, Mr. Wright provided medical evidence establishing his total disability from August 29 through October 8; that J&K paid him $16.00 an hour, which was paid at the end of each project; and that he worked “almost every day.” However, he did not provide any evidence regarding the actual days he worked or the specific amounts J& K Improvements paid.

After the January 19 hearing, the Court held Mr. Wright established he is likely to prove that he was Mr. Cooper’s employee when he was injured on August 28, 2020, thus making Mr. Cooper liable for benefits. The Court also held that Mr. Wright is likely to prove entitlement to payment of reasonable and necessary medical expenses causally related to his fracture and entitlement to temporary total disability from August 29 through October 8. However, he did not provide sufficient evidence to determine his compensation rate. Finally, the Court found that Mr. Wright is eligible to receive benefits from the Uninsured Employer’s Fund under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-801.

After receiving the Court’s order, Mr. Wright filed another Request for Expedited Hearing. He attached a Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72 Statement in which he asserted that when he was hired on May 18, 2020, he worked forty hours per week for two weeks at $14.00 per hour, and at the end of May, Mr. Cooper raised his pay to $16.00 per hour. The only additional evidence that Mr. Wright provided as to his actual pay or the hours he worked while employed by Mr. Cooper was indirectly when he calculated his “lost wages” from his injury through January based on a forty-hour workweek.

As for Mrs. Cooper, Mr. Wright added her as an employer at the top of the Request for Expedited Hearing and asserted in his Rule 72 Statement that Mr. Cooper hired him for “his [sic] and his wife’s business, J&K Improvements.” He went on to say that “the Coopers” agreed to pay him $16.00 per hour, and he made multiple references to working for “the Coopers.”

Mr. Cooper did not provide any evidence in response to the request for expedited hearing.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Wright bears the burden of presenting sufficient evidence to show that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2020); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(1)(a) sets out that temporary total disability benefits are based on two thirds of the injured employee’s average weekly

2 wage. The Court finds the undisputed evidence shows that Mr. Wright is likely to prove he worked forty hours per week during his employment with Mr. Cooper. He worked from May 18 through May 31 at $14.00 per hour and from June 1 until August 28 at $16.00 per hour. Based on this finding, the Court calculates Mr. Wright’s average weekly wage to be $629.86, and two-thirds of this amount leads to a compensation rate of $419.91.

However, to receive temporary total disability benefits, Mr. Wright must also show he is likely to prove: (1) a disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Shepherd v. Haren Const. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). While medical proof is not an “absolute prerequisite” to receiving temporary disability benefits, any award must be consistent with the medical evidence. Austin v. Genlyte Thomas Grp., LLC, No. M2009- 01601-WC-R3-WC, 2010 Tenn. LEXIS 652, at *10,11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel July 12, 2010).

Previously, the Court found Mr. Wright was entitled to temporary total disability benefits from August 29 through October 8. While Mr. Wright alleged that he did not work from August 29 through February 2, 2021, the Court holds that his allegation without medical proof is insufficient to show he is likely to prove at trial that his inability to work extended beyond October 8. Thus, the Court holds that Mr. Cooper must pay temporary total disability benefits from August 29 through October 8, 2020, at a compensation rate of $419.91 for a total of $2,459.47. Mr. Wright’s claim for additional temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.

Regarding Mr. Wright’s assertion that Mrs. Cooper was a partner in J&K Improvements and thus was also his employer, the Court holds the scant evidence he provided is insufficient to overcome Mr. Cooper’s assertions to the Court and to the Uninsured Employer’s Fund investigator that he was the business’s sole proprietor. As a result, the Court holds at this time that Mrs. Cooper was not Mr. Wright’s employer.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:

1. Mr. Cooper shall pay Mr. Wright temporary total disability benefits in the amount of $2,459.47.

2. Mr. Wright is eligible to recetve an award from the Uninsured Employer’s Fund under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-801 for the past temporary total disability benefits owed by Mr. Cooper based on the Court’s holding set out in its previous Expedited Hearing Order. Mr. Wright may request this award using the attached form. . Mr. Cooper remains obligated to pay Mr. Wright’s past and future expenses for the

reasonable and necessary treatment of his work-related injuries, and Mr. Wright remains eligible to receive reimbursement from the Uninsured Employer’s Fund for expenses from providers identified in the previous Expedited Hearing Order.

Mrs. Cooper retains no liability for Mr. Wright’s claim at this time.

This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on April 15, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. Central Time. The parties must call 615-253-0010 or toll-free at 855-689-9049 to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without your further participation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 TN WC 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-tracy-v-joshua-cooper-dba-jk-improvements-tennworkcompcl-2021.