Wrice v. State

283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 708, 2009 WL 1449849
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 2009·No. ED 91453·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Bryan Wrice, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wrice v. State, 283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 708, 2009 WL 1449849 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

283 S.W.3d 314 (Wrice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Douglas v. State
283 S.W.3d 314 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)