Wrice v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wrice v. State

283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 708, 2009 WL 1449849

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 2009

DocketED 91453

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 314 (Wrice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wrice v. State, 283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 708, 2009 WL 1449849 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Bryan Wrice, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Bryan Wrice, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 708, 2009 WL 1449849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wrice-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack