Douglas v. State

283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 713, 2009 WL 1449944
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 26, 2009
DocketED 91392
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 314 (Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Douglas v. State, 283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 713, 2009 WL 1449944 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

*315 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Mary M. Douglas, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wrice v. State
283 S.W.3d 314 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 S.W.3d 314, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 713, 2009 WL 1449944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/douglas-v-state-moctapp-2009.