Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wray v. State

Wray v. State

596 So. 2d 80, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 1992 WL 9704
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 1992
DocketNo. 90-01845
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 596 So. 2d 80 (Wray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wray v. State, 596 So. 2d 80, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 1992 WL 9704 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

HALL, Acting Chief Judge.

We find merit only in Wray’s argument that the trial court improperly imposed court costs as a condition of probation without citing proper statutory authority. Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), review denied, 515 So.2d 229 (Fla.1987); Moore v. State, 525 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the imposition of court costs be stricken without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition with citation of proper statutory authority.

Affirmed and remanded.

THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. State
640 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 So. 2d 80, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 1992 WL 9704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wray-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.