Wray v. State
596 So. 2d 80, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 1992 WL 9704
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1992·No. No. 90-01845·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find merit only in Wray’s argument that the trial court improperly imposed court costs as a condition of probation without citing proper statutory authority. Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), review denied, 515 So.2d 229 (Fla.1987); Moore v. State, 525 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we remand with directions that the imposition of court costs be stricken without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition with citation of proper statutory authority.
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wray v. State, 596 So. 2d 80, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 1992 WL 9704 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
596 So. 2d 80 (Wray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
640 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)