Wray v. Harris

77 N.C. 77

Opinion

RodmaN, J.

It is very clear that the claim'of lien filed im the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court does not come> up to the requirements of the Act. Bat. Rev. ch. 65, § 4.. ■It does not specify in detail the materials furnished or la-• bor performed, or give the dates at which the materials were; furnished or the labor was performed. The date given in.' the claim was evidently intended only as the date when it; was put in writing for the purpose of being filed. Such, liens are tbe creatures of the statute and its requirements-must be substantially observed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.