Wragg v. Executors of Allen

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Wragg v. Executors of Allen

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 402

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 23, 1745

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 402 (Wragg v. Executors of Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wragg v. Executors of Allen, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 402 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1745).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. Rutledge on behalf of the Plaintiff That an Attachment do go for want of an Answer against the Defendants in this Cause, Mr. Graeme on behalf of the Defendants Consented, that unless the Said Defendants do put in an Answer to the Complainant’s Bill by this day Month, an Attachment be issued against them, And it is Ordered accordingly, That an Attachment do issue without further Order if the Said Defendants Do not put in their Answer to the Complainant’s Bill within One Month from this Time.

Andw Rutledge James Graeme,

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. Rutledge on behalf of the Plaintiff That an Attachment do go for want of an Answer against the Defendants in this Cause, Mr. Graeme on behalf of the Defendants Consented, that unless the Said Defendants do put in an Answer to the Complainant’s Bill by this day Month, an Attachment be issued against them, And it is Ordered accordingly, That an Attachment do issue without further Order if the Said Defendants Do not put in their Answer to the Complainant’s Bill within One Month from this Time.

Andw Rutledge James Graeme,

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wragg-v-executors-of-allen-ctchansc-1745.