Woynicz v. Woynicz

186 F.2d 505
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 1951
Docket12555_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 F.2d 505 (Woynicz v. Woynicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woynicz v. Woynicz, 186 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jurisdiction in the instant case is based on diversity of citizenship and jurisdictional amount. The plaintiff seeks to enforce a separation agreement made in New York. The contract in all respects is a valid and enforceable one under the laws of New York and nothing contained in it is contrary to the public policy of California. Every question presented by the appeal is. one of fact and we cannot say the trial court’s findings were clearly erroneous. The record fully supports tire conclusion that the defendant was competent to execute the agreement in suit. We can perceive no error. Consequently, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holcomb v. Holcomb
209 F.2d 794 (D.C. Circuit, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 F.2d 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woynicz-v-woynicz-ca9-1951.