Woven Cord Bed Spring Co. v. Coxedge

Appellate Court of Illinois

Woven Cord Bed Spring Co. v. Coxedge

50 Ill. App. 334, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 427

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 19, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 Ill. App. 334 (Woven Cord Bed Spring Co. v. Coxedge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woven Cord Bed Spring Co. v. Coxedge, 50 Ill. App. 334, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 427 (Ill. Ct. App. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court,

Waterman, J.

This was a proceeding commenced by attachment. It is insisted that the affidavit upon which it was prosecuted is insufficient, and it is also argued that the instructions given ' upon the trial Avere improper.

Appellants have not included in their abstract either the affidavit or the instructions complained of; and, as we have often said, in such cases we are not bound to consider either. An index is not an abstract. Joliet Street Ry. Co. v. Call, 42 Ill. App. 41; Chicago Consolidated Bottling Co. v. Mitton, 41 Ill. App. 154; Joliet Street Ry. Co. v. McCarthy, 42 Ill. App. 49; Ward v. Stanley, 41 Ill. App. 417.

Upon the merits Ave see no sufficient reason for interfering Avith the conclusion to which the court and jury came. There was sufficient evidence to Avarrant the finding against Springer, although he may not have signed any paper or been actually interested in the business in Avhich appellee was employed.

There are no reviewable errors in the record of this cause unless they are to be found in the affidavit for attachment on the instructions given by the court, and for the reasons indicated we decline to go through the record, find and examine these documents.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI