Woullard v. Dugger

596 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4463, 1992 WL 74965
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1992·No. No. 91-1388·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order of the trial court which effectively held that appellant was not eligible for provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes, on a sentence which precedes a habitual offender sentence. We reverse.

As we recently held in Dugger v. Anderson, 593 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), appellant is entitled to provisional credits on a sentence which precedes his sentence as a habitual offender.

Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and this matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

JOANOS, C.J., and ERVIN and WIGGINTOÑ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woullard v. Dugger, 596 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4463, 1992 WL 74965 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 166 (Woullard v. Dugger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Senko v. Singletary
599 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)