Woullard v. Dugger

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Woullard v. Dugger

596 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4463, 1992 WL 74965

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1388

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 596 So. 2d 166 (Woullard v. Dugger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woullard v. Dugger, 596 So. 2d 166, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4463, 1992 WL 74965 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order of the trial court which effectively held that appellant was not eligible for provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes, on a sentence which precedes a habitual offender sentence. We reverse.

As we recently held in Dugger v. Anderson, 593 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), appellant is entitled to provisional credits on a sentence which precedes his sentence as a habitual offender.

Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and this matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

JOANOS, C.J., and ERVIN and WIGGINTOÑ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI