Senko v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Senko v. Singletary

599 So. 2d 137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4628, 1992 WL 76740

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1992·No. No. 91-1886·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order of the trial court which effectively held that appellant was not eligible for provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes, on a sentence which precedes a habitual offender sentence. We reverse.

As we recently held in Dugger v. Anderson, 593 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), appellant is entitled to provisional credits on a sentence which precedes his sentence as a habitual offender. See also Woullard v. Dugger, 596 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and this matter is remanded to the [138]*138trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SHIVERS, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order of the trial court which effectively held that appellant was not eligible for provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes, on a sentence which precedes a habitual offender sentence. We reverse.

As we recently held in Dugger v. Anderson, 593 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), appellant is entitled to provisional credits on a sentence which precedes his sentence as a habitual offender. See also Woullard v. Dugger, 596 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and this matter is remanded to the [138]*138trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SHIVERS, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Senko v. Singletary, 599 So. 2d 137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4628, 1992 WL 76740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

599 So. 2d 137 (Senko v. Singletary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related