Senko v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Senko v. Singletary

599 So. 2d 137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4628, 1992 WL 76740

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 20, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1886

StatusPublished

This text of 599 So. 2d 137 (Senko v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Senko v. Singletary, 599 So. 2d 137, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4628, 1992 WL 76740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order of the trial court which effectively held that appellant was not eligible for provisional credits under section 944.277, Florida Statutes, on a sentence which precedes a habitual offender sentence. We reverse.

As we recently held in Dugger v. Anderson, 593 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), appellant is entitled to provisional credits on a sentence which precedes his sentence as a habitual offender. See also Woullard v. Dugger, 596 So.2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Accordingly, the order on appeal is reversed and this matter is remanded to the [138]*138trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SHIVERS, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI