WORZ, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
358 U.S. 55, 79 S. Ct. 114, 3 L. Ed. 2d 48, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1914
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. In view of the representations in the Solicitor General’s brief on pages 4 and 5, concerning testimony given before the Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce subsequent to the decision by the Court of Appeals in this case, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for such action as it may deem appropriate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WORZ, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 358 U.S. 55, 79 S. Ct. 114, 3 L. Ed. 2d 48, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1914 (1958).
358 U.S. 55 (WORZ, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Angels Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Fidelity Television, Inc., Rko General, Inc., Intervenors
745 F.2d 656 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
TV 9, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
495 F.2d 929 (D.C. Circuit, 1973)
Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
403 F.2d 585 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Consolidated Nine, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Comint Corporation and Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenors. Comint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor
403 F.2d 585 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mid-Florida Television Corporation, Intervenor
268 F.2d 889 (D.C. Circuit, 1959)
WORZ, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
358 U.S. 55 (Supreme Court, 1958)