Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Worwa v. Vann

Worwa v. Vann

231 A.D.2d 849, 647 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14219
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 27, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D.2d 849 (Worwa v. Vann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worwa v. Vann, 231 A.D.2d 849, 647 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s liability for striking and injuring plaintiff Patricia Worma. We reject the contention that defendant may not be held liable in negligence for conduct allegedly resulting from his withdrawal [850]*850from prescription drugs (see, Williams v Hays, 143 NY 442; Mochen v State of New York, 43 AD2d 484, 485-486). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. . Hays
38 N.E. 449 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Mochen v. State
43 A.D.2d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D.2d 849, 647 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worwa-v-vann-nyappdiv-1996.