Worwa v. Vann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Worwa v. Vann

231 A.D.2d 849, 647 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14219

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 1996·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s liability for striking and injuring plaintiff Patricia Worma. We reject the contention that defendant may not be held liable in negligence for conduct allegedly resulting from his withdrawal [850] from prescription drugs (see, Williams v Hays, 143 NY 442; Mochen v State of New York, 43 AD2d 484, 485-486). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s liability for striking and injuring plaintiff Patricia Worma. We reject the contention that defendant may not be held liable in negligence for conduct allegedly resulting from his withdrawal [850] from prescription drugs (see, Williams v Hays, 143 NY 442; Mochen v State of New York, 43 AD2d 484, 485-486). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Worwa v. Vann, 231 A.D.2d 849, 647 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

231 A.D.2d 849 (Worwa v. Vann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related