Worthington v. Worthington

219 S.E.2d 260, 27 N.C. App. 340, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1842
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 5, 1975
Docket758DC385
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 219 S.E.2d 260 (Worthington v. Worthington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worthington v. Worthington, 219 S.E.2d 260, 27 N.C. App. 340, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1842 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

Although we express no opinion on whether we would have reached the same result on the evidence before the court at the hearing for alimony pendente lite, there is some evidence to support the findings of fact made by the trial judge, and we are bound by them. The findings of fact are sufficient to support the order and it is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges Morris and Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Pollard
389 S.E.2d 589 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Bigley v. Lombardo
367 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Roberts v. Roberts
314 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation
291 S.E.2d 844 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Self v. Self
286 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Wurlitzer Distributing Corp. v. Schofield
261 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.E.2d 260, 27 N.C. App. 340, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthington-v-worthington-ncctapp-1975.