Worthington v. Worthington
219 S.E.2d 260, 27 N.C. App. 340, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1842
Opinion
Although we express no opinion on whether we would have reached the same result on the evidence before the court at the hearing for alimony pendente lite, there is some evidence to support the findings of fact made by the trial judge, and we are bound by them. The findings of fact are sufficient to support the order and it is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Worthington v. Worthington, 219 S.E.2d 260, 27 N.C. App. 340, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1842 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).
219 S.E.2d 260 (Worthington v. Worthington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Aluminum Products, Inc. v. Pollard
389 S.E.2d 589 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Bigley v. Lombardo
367 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Roberts v. Roberts
314 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation
291 S.E.2d 844 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Self v. Self
286 S.E.2d 579 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Wurlitzer Distributing Corp. v. Schofield
261 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)