Worthington v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.

791 F.2d 802, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1152
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 12, 1986·No. Nos. 84-3647, 84-3669·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Before: WRIGHT, SNEED and ALAR-CON, Circuit Judges.

On a grant of certiorari from our opinion reported at 749 F.2d 1409, superseded by 774 F.2d 349 (9th Cir.1985), the Supreme Court has vacated that opinion and remanded for further proceedings. — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1527, 89 L.Ed.2d 739. We erred. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Let the mandate issue now.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worthington v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., 791 F.2d 802, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1152 (9th Cir. 1986).

791 F.2d 802 (Worthington v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related