Home/Ninth Circuit/Worthington v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.

Worthington v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.

791 F.2d 802, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1152
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 12, 1986
DocketNos. 84-3647, 84-3669
StatusPublished

This text of 791 F.2d 802 (Worthington v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Worthington v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., 791 F.2d 802, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1152 (9th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

ORDER

Before: WRIGHT, SNEED and ALAR-CON, Circuit Judges.

On a grant of certiorari from our opinion reported at 749 F.2d 1409, superseded by 774 F.2d 349 (9th Cir.1985), the Supreme Court has vacated that opinion and remanded for further proceedings. — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1527, 89 L.Ed.2d 739. We erred. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Let the mandate issue now.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington
475 U.S. 709 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Larry Worthington, Roger Cameron, David Davey and Gerald Kent, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Cross
749 F.2d 1409 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Larry Worthington, Roger Cameron, David Davey and Gerald Kent, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Cross
774 F.2d 349 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 F.2d 802, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worthington-v-icicle-seafoods-inc-ca9-1986.