Worrall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Worrall v. State

282 S.W.3d 386, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 2009 WL 685319

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2009·No. ED 91415·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant John Worrall appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without a hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting *387 forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant John Worrall appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without a hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting *387 forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Worrall v. State, 282 S.W.3d 386, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 364, 2009 WL 685319 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

282 S.W.3d 386 (Worrall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related