State v. Wah
282 S.W.3d 386, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 2009 WL 668280
Opinion
Order
Freddie Wah challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions for first-degree assault, second-degree murder, first-degree robbery, and three counts of armed criminal action. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find the evidence was sufficient and affirm the convictions. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wah, 282 S.W.3d 386, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 2009 WL 668280 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
282 S.W.3d 386 (State v. Wah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Complete Title of Case Wah v. State
413 S.W.3d 31 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013)
Worrall v. State
282 S.W.3d 386 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)