worldnetdaily.com, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 19, 2016
DocketCivil Action No. 2015-0549
StatusPublished

This text of worldnetdaily.com, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (worldnetdaily.com, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
worldnetdaily.com, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice, (D.D.C. 2016).

Opinion

81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 )25 7+( ',675,&7 2) &2/80%,$ BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

:25/'1(7'$,/<&20 ,1&

3ODLQWLII

Y &LYLO $FWLRQ 1R  $%-

86 '(3$570(17 2) -867,&(

'HIHQGDQW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

0(025$1'80 23,1,21

3ODLQWLII :RUOGQHWGDLO\FRP ,QF EURXJKW WKLV DFWLRQ DJDLQVW GHIHQGDQW WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV

'HSDUWPHQW RI -XVWLFH XQGHU WKH )UHHGRP RI ,QIRUPDWLRQ $FW )2,$   86& †  VHHNLQJ DOO

WKH ³PDWHULDOV XVHG LQ WKH LQYHVWLJDWLRQ E\ WKH :DVKLQJWRQ '& 0HWURSROLWDQ 3ROLFH 'HSDUWPHQW

DQG UHYLHZHG E\ WKH 86 $WWRUQH\¶V 2IILFH IRU WKH 'LVWULFW RI &ROXPELD LQWR WKH 2FWREHU>@  

IDWDO VKRRWLQJ RI 0LULDP &DUH\ E\ XQLIRUPHG DJHQWV RI WKH 86 6HFUHW 6HUYLFH DQG RIILFHUV RI WKH

86 &DSLWRO 3ROLFH 'HSDUWPHQW´ DORQJ ZLWK ³WKH ILQDO UHSRUW DQG ILQGLQJV RI WKDW LQYHVWLJDWLRQ´

&RPSO >'NW  @ ˆ  $IWHU FRQGXFWLQJ D VHDUFK DQG ORFDWLQJ UHVSRQVLYH UHFRUGV GHIHQGDQW

SURGXFHG D QXPEHU RI UHFRUGV WR SODLQWLII VRPH RI ZKLFK ZHUH SURGXFHG LQ UHGDFWHG IRUP 'HI¶V

0RW IRU 6XPP - >'NW  @ ³'HI¶V 0RW´  0HP LQ 6XSS RI 'HI¶V 0RW >'NW  @ ³'HI¶V

0HP´ DW  'HIHQGDQW DOVR ZLWKKHOG VHYHUDO GRFXPHQWV LQ IXOO DQG LW QRZ PRYHV IRU VXPPDU\

MXGJPHQW 'HI¶V 0RW 'HI¶V 0HP DW 

,Q D )2,$ FDVH WKH GLVWULFW FRXUW UHYLHZV WKH DJHQF\¶V DFWLRQ GH QRYR DQG ³WKH EXUGHQ LV

RQ WKH DJHQF\ WR VXVWDLQ LWV DFWLRQ´  86& †  D  %  accord Military Audit Project v.

Casey  )G   '& &LU   ³)2,$ FDVHV DUH W\SLFDOO\ DQG DSSURSULDWHO\ GHFLGHG

RQ PRWLRQV IRU VXPPDU\ MXGJPHQW´ Moore v. Bush  ) 6XSS G   ''&   2Q D PRWLRQ IRU VXPPDU\ MXGJPHQW D FRXUW ³PXVW YLHZ WKH HYLGHQFH LQ WKH OLJKW PRVW IDYRUDEOH WR WKH

QRQPRYLQJ SDUW\ GUDZ DOO UHDVRQDEOH LQIHUHQFHV LQ KLV IDYRU DQG HVFKHZ PDNLQJ FUHGLELOLW\

GHWHUPLQDWLRQV RU ZHLJKLQJ WKH HYLGHQFH´ Montgomery v. Chao  )G   '& &LU

  see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.  86  ±   %XW ZKHUH D

SODLQWLII KDV QRW SURYLGHG HYLGHQFH WKDW DQ DJHQF\ DFWHG LQ EDG IDLWK ³D FRXUW PD\ DZDUG VXPPDU\

MXGJPHQW VROHO\ RQ WKH EDVLV RI LQIRUPDWLRQ SURYLGHG E\ WKH DJHQF\ LQ GHFODUDWLRQV´ Moore 

) 6XSS G DW 

'HIHQGDQW SURGXFHG D QXPEHU RI UHFRUGV WR SODLQWLII EXW LW ZLWKKHOG WKH IROORZLQJ

GRFXPHQWV LQ IXOO

>$@ SDJH 0HPRUDQGXP ZULWWHQ E\ WKH LQYHVWLJDWLYH $VVLVWDQW 8QLWHG 6WDWHV $WWRUQH\V WR WKHLU VXSHULRUV UHFRPPHQGLQJ DJDLQVW SURVHFXWLRQ WKH ³>'@HFOLQDWLRQ 0HPR´ RU WKH ³0HPR´   YLGHRV DQG DXGLRV RI LQWHUYLHZV RI FLYLOLDQ DQG ODZ HQIRUFHPHQW ZLWQHVVHV DQG  KLJK UHVROXWLRQ DHULDO SKRWRV RI WKH :KLWH +RXVH FRPSOH[ WDNHQ IURP D UHVWULFWHG DLUVSDFH

'HI¶V 0HP DW  ,Q LWV RSSRVLWLRQ WR GHIHQGDQW¶V PRWLRQ IRU VXPPDU\ MXGJPHQW SODLQWLII VWDWHV

WKDW LW LV ³VDWLVILHG ZLWK >@ >G@HIHQGDQW¶V HIIRUWV WR LGHQWLI\ UHVSRQVLYH UHFRUGV DQG GRHV QRW

FKDOOHQJH WKH DGHTXDF\ RI LWV VHDUFK IRU UHTXHVWHG UHFRUGV´ 3O¶V 0HP RI /DZ LQ 2SS WR 'HI¶V

0RW >'NW  @ ³3O¶V 2SS´ DW  3ODLQWLII DOVR UHSUHVHQWV WKDW LW GRHV QRW FKDOOHQJH WKH

ZLWKKROGLQJ RI WKH  DHULDO SKRWRJUDSKV RU WKH  YLGHR DQG DXGLR UHFRUGV DV H[HPSW IURP )2,$

Id.

7KXV WKH RQO\ LVVXH EHIRUH WKH &RXUW LV ZKHWKHU GHIHQGDQW SURSHUO\ ZLWKKHOG WKH

'HFOLQDWLRQ 0HPR DV VXEMHFW WR ³WKH DWWRUQH\ ZRUNSURGXFW DQG GHOLEHUDWLYH SURFHVV SULYLOHJHV

LQFOXGH>HG@ LQ )2,$¶V ([HPSWLRQ E  ´ 'HI¶V 0HP DW  'HIHQGDQW H[SODLQV WKDW LW ZLWKKHOG

WKDW GRFXPHQW EHFDXVH LW LV ³DQ LQWUDDJHQF\ FRPPXQLFDWLRQ FUHDWHG DV SDUW RI WKH GHFLVLRQPDNLQJ

SURFHVV UHJDUGLQJ ZKHWKHU RU QRW WR SURVHFXWH WKH IHGHUDO RIILFHUV´ LQYROYHG LQ WKH &DUH\ VKRRWLQJ

 ZKLFK ³GHVFULEHV WKH IHGHUDO SURVHFXWRUV¶ YLHZV RI WKH FULPLQDO LQYHVWLJDWLRQ DQG FRQWDLQV WKHLU

OHJDO UHDVRQLQJ DQDO\VLV RI WKH HYLGHQFH DQG WKHLU UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV WR WKHLU VXSHULRUV QRW WR

SXUVXH FKDUJHV´ Id. 3ODLQWLII PDLQWDLQV WKDW WKH 'HFOLQDWLRQ 0HPR ³LV QRW D SUHGHFLVLRQDO

GRFXPHQW RU GHOLEHUDWLYH FRPPXQLFDWLRQ´ EXW ³>U@DWKHU LW LV WKH ILQDO GHWHUPLQDWLRQ WR GHFOLQH

SURVHFXWLRQ DQG LV QRW H[HPSW IURP GLVFORVXUH XQGHU )2,$´ 3O¶V 2SS DW 

7R DVVLVW LW LQ UHVROYLQJ WKH LVVXH RI ZKHWKHU WKH GRFXPHQW LQ TXHVWLRQ LV VXEMHFW WR WKH

GHOLEHUDWLYH SURFHVV SULYLOHJH WKH &RXUW RUGHUHG GHIHQGDQW WR SURGXFH WKH 'HFOLQDWLRQ 0HPR WR

WKH &RXUW IRU in camera UHYLHZ 0LQ 2UGHU 6HSW    8SRQ UHYLHZ RI WKH GRFXPHQW WKH

&RXUW FRQFOXGHV WKDW LW LV XQDPELJXRXVO\ SUHGHFLVLRQDO DQG GHOLEHUDWLYH LQ QDWXUH 7KHUHIRUH LW LV

SURWHFWHG E\ WKH GHOLEHUDWLYH SURFHVV SULYLOHJH DQG GHIHQGDQW¶V PRWLRQ IRU VXPPDU\ MXGJPHQW ZLOO

EH JUDQWHG

7KH GHOLEHUDWLYH SURFHVV SULYLOHJH SURWHFWV IURP GLVFORVXUH ³LQWHUDJHQF\ RU LQWUDDJHQF\

PHPRUDQGXPV RU OHWWHUV WKDW ZRXOG QRW EH DYDLODEOH E\ ODZ WR D SDUW\ RWKHU WKDQ DQ DJHQF\ LQ

OLWLJDWLRQ ZLWK WKH DJHQF\´  86& †  E   7KH SULYLOHJH ³UHVWV RQ WKH REYLRXV UHDOL]DWLRQ

WKDW RIILFLDOV ZLOO QRW FRPPXQLFDWH FDQGLGO\ DPRQJ WKHPVHOYHV LI HDFK UHPDUN LV D SRWHQWLDO LWHP

RI GLVFRYHU\´ DQG LWV SXUSRVH ³LV WR HQKDQFH µWKH TXDOLW\ RI DJHQF\ GHFLVLRQV¶ E\ SURWHFWLQJ RSHQ

DQG IUDQN GLVFXVVLRQ DPRQJ WKRVH ZKR PDNH WKHP ZLWKLQ WKH >J@RYHUQPHQW´ U.S. Dep’t of

Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n  86  ±   TXRWLQJ NLRB v. Sears,

Roebuck & Co.  86     7KXV WKH SULYLOHJH RQO\ ³SURWHFWV DJHQF\ GRFXPHQWV

WKDW DUH ERWK SUHGHFLVLRQDO DQG GHOLEHUDWLYH´ Judicial Watch, Inc. v. FDA  )G  

'& &LU   accord McKinley v. Bd. of Governors of Fed. Reserve Sys.  )G  

'& &LU   ³>$@ GRFXPHQW >LV@ SUHGHFLVLRQDO LI µLW ZDV JHQHUDWHG EHIRUH WKH DGRSWLRQ RI DQ

DJHQF\ SROLF\¶ DQG GHOLEHUDWLYH LI µLW UHIOHFWV WKH JLYHDQGWDNH RI WKH FRQVXOWDWLYH SURFHVV¶´

 Judicial Watch  )G DW  TXRWLQJ Coastal States Gas Corp. v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy 

)G   '& &LU  

8SRQ FRQVLGHUDWLRQ RI WKH SDUWLHV¶ SOHDGLQJV DQG WKH 'HFOLQDWLRQ 0HPR LWVHOI WKH &RXUW

ILQGV WKDW WKH GRFXPHQW ZDV SURSHUO\ ZLWKKHOG DV VXEMHFW WR WKH GHOLEHUDWLYH SURFHVV SULYLOHJH

7KH &RXUW¶V in camera UHYLHZ RI WKH 'HFOLQDWLRQ 0HPR FRQILUPHG WKDW LW VDWLVILHV ERWK SURQJV RI

WKH GHOLEHUDWLYH SURFHVV SULYLOHJH EHFDXVH LW LV ERWK SUHGHFLVLRQDO DQG GHOLEHUDWLYH 7KH

PHPRUDQGXP FRQYH\V WKH UHFRPPHQGDWLRQ RI WZR $VVLVWDQW 8QLWHG 6WDWHV $WWRUQH\V ³$86$V´

WR WKHLU VXSHUYLVRUV ZLWKLQ WKH 86 $WWRUQH\¶V 2IILFH WKDW WKH 86 $WWRUQH\ IRU WKH 'LVWULFW RI

&ROXPELD VKRXOG GHFOLQH WR SURVHFXWH WKH RIILFHUV LQYROYHG LQ WKH &DUH\ VKRRWLQJ DQG LW OD\V RXW

WKH HYLGHQFH DQG DQDO\VLV XSRQ ZKLFK WKDW UHFRPPHQGDWLRQ LV EDVHG 6XFK GRFXPHQWV KDYH

URXWLQHO\ EHHQ IRXQG WR EH H[HPSW IURP GLVFORVXUH XQGHU )2,$ See, e.g. Paisley v. CIA 

)G   '& &LU  REVHUYLQJ WKDW ³WKH LQIRUPDWLRQJDWKHULQJ DQG GHOLEHUDWLYH SURFHVV

WKDW SURGXFHV´ ³D GHFLVLRQ DV WR ZKHWKHU RU QRW WR SURVHFXWH VRPHRQH´ ³LV SUHFLVHO\ WKH W\SH RI

PDWHULDO WR EH SURWHFWHG DV SUHGHFLVLRQDO XQGHU ([HPSWLRQ ´  RSLQLRQ YDFDWHG LQ SDUW RQ RWKHU

JURXQGV  )G  '& &LU   Heggestad v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice  ) 6XSS G  

''&  ³>$@OO GRFXPHQWV SUHSDUHG E\ WKH DJHQF\ ZLWK UHJDUG WR WKLV SURVHFXWLRQ SULRU WR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
worldnetdaily.com, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/worldnetdailycom-inc-v-us-department-of-justice-dcd-2016.