Wooten v. State

47 S.E. 193, 119 Ga. 745, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 350
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 29, 1904·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Evidence that the accused committed the crime charged in Pinehurst, without showing the county or that the Pinehurst referred to is in Georgia, is not sufficient proof of venue. Cooper v. State, 106 Ga. 119; Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wooten v. State, 47 S.E. 193, 119 Ga. 745, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 350 (Ga. 1904).

47 S.E. 193 (Wooten v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patterson v. State
276 S.E.2d 900 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Davis v. State
17 S.E.2d 554 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Whitfield v. State
180 S.E. 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Georgia Power Co. v. Woodall
172 S.E. 76 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Casper v. State
157 S.E. 883 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Murphy v. State
48 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)