Moye v. State

65 Ga. 754
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 65 Ga. 754 (Moye v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754 (Ga. 1880).

Opinion

Crawford, Justice.

The defendant in the court below was indicted for the offense of “larceny from the person,” and upon being convicted moved a new trial, because the testimony did not show that the offense was committed in the county of Sumter; and further, because the proof showed that if defendant were guilty of any offense it was not larceny from the person.

1. An examination of the testimony sent up with the record shows that the only proof touching the venue was, that the crime was committed in the lumber-yard of a Mr. Sloan, in the city of Americus; but it is nowhere shown that it was committed in the county of Sumter, where the defendant was tried. This must be done clearly and beyond all reasonable doubt. 56 Ga., 36.

2, To constitute larceny from the person, it must appear that some article of value was wrongfully and fraudulently taken from the person of another privately and without his knowledge, with intent to steal the same.

The prosecutor swears that at the time of the commission of the act he “was intoxicated, but not so drunk as not to know what was going on, and when he took the money from his vest pocket, he consented for him to do it, and if he had paid it back it would have been all right; did not consent for defendant to take the money out of his pocket, but did not object to his taking care of it, after he had taken it out.”

This testimony is not sufficient to show that the taking was done privately and without the knowledge of the owner.

[756]*756This case comes before us quite unsatisfactorily to enable us to arrive accurately at what was done on the trial, both as to the evidence and the grounds of the motion for a new trial. But we rule the case by the record.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lynn v. State
565 S.E.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Barker v. State
438 S.E.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Cole v. State
291 S.E.2d 427 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Patterson v. State
276 S.E.2d 900 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Hammond v. State
77 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Witcher v. State
69 S.E.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Davis v. State
17 S.E.2d 554 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Fowler v. State
8 S.E.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Dickerson v. State
199 S.E. 142 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Gibson v. State
183 S.E. 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Whitfield v. State
180 S.E. 630 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Casper v. State
157 S.E. 883 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Mann v. State
152 S.E. 854 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Gamblin v. State
125 S.E. 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Walker v. State
117 S.E. 822 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Taylor v. State
113 S.E. 147 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Dennis v. State
91 S.E. 783 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Beatty v. City of Atlanta
83 S.E. 885 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Wade v. State
75 S.E. 494 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Parrish v. State
74 S.E. 445 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Ga. 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moye-v-state-ga-1880.