Wooten v. California
178 L. Ed. 2d 19, 131 S. Ct. 385, 562 U.S. 823, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6385, 79 U.S.L.W. 3195
This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 19 (Wooten v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wooten v. California, 178 L. Ed. 2d 19, 131 S. Ct. 385, 562 U.S. 823, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6385, 79 U.S.L.W. 3195 (U.S. 2010).
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 783.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Robert Wooten v. State of California
372 F. App'x 783 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 19, 131 S. Ct. 385, 562 U.S. 823, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6385, 79 U.S.L.W. 3195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-v-california-scotus-2010.