Robert Wooten v. State of California

372 F. App'x 783
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 2010
Docket09-15560
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 372 F. App'x 783 (Robert Wooten v. State of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Wooten v. State of California, 372 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Robert Wooten appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants violated his First and Tenth Amendment rights by virtue of a California Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage in California. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order granting a motion to dismiss. Sacks v. Office of Foreign Assets Control, 466 F.3d 764, 770 (9th Cir.2006). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

We do not consider Wooten’s arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1223 (9th Cir.2007).

Wooten’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wooten v. California
178 L. Ed. 2d 19 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 F. App'x 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-wooten-v-state-of-california-ca9-2010.