Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.
This text of 562 S.E.2d 422 (Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Beatrice WOODY, Employee
v.
THOMASVILLE UPHOLSTERY INCORPORATED, Employer,
Self-Insured (Helsman-Management Services, Inc., Servicing Agent).
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mary F. Pyron, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.
Morris York Williams Surles & Barringer, LLP by Thomas E. Williams and Stephen Kushner, Charlotte; and Orbock Bowden Ruark & Dillard by Maureen S. Orbock and Devin F. Thomas, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
562 S.E.2d 422, 355 N.C. 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-thomasville-upholstery-inc-nc-2002.