Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.

557 S.E.2d 538, 354 N.C. 371
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 8, 2001·No. No. 596A01·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 8 November 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc., 557 S.E.2d 538, 354 N.C. 371 (N.C. 2001).

557 S.E.2d 538 (Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Variety Wholesalers, Inc. v. Salem Logistics Traffic Services, LLC
723 S.E.2d 744 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2012)
Jones v. Harrelson and Smith Contractors, LLC
670 S.E.2d 242 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
HORRY v. Woodbury
659 S.E.2d 88 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Kniep v. Templeton
649 S.E.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Griffith v. Glen Wood Co., Inc.
646 S.E.2d 550 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Jones v. Harrelson & Smith Contractors, LLC
638 S.E.2d 222 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
Eley v. Mid/East Acceptance Corp. of N.C., Inc.
614 S.E.2d 555 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Eli Research, Inc. v. United Communications Group, LLC
312 F. Supp. 2d 748 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)
State Ex Rel. Pilard v. Berninger
571 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)