Woodworth v. Insurance Co.

5 U.S. 87
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice MILLEB,

delivered the opinion of the' court.

The litigation to • establish the liability of the Boss was troublesome and expensive to the Corn Exchange Company. Mr. Woodworth did not, in any manner, aid, or offer to aid in it. His interest was against the liability which the company sought to establish; for, if the Boss was declared pot liable, he received these proceeds .and remnants as mortgagee of that vessel. But, after permitting his own libel to sleep during this struggle, he attempts, When it is over, to revive that libel, and claims to share in the fruits of a victory won without his aid, and against his wishes. The District and Circuit Courts both thought he was not entitled to do this, so long as the Corn Exchange Company remained unpaid. In this view' we concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodworth v. Insurance Co., 5 U.S. 87 (1866).

5 U.S. 87 (Woodworth v. Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brickhouse
890 P.2d 353 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1995)
Barry W. Ritchie v. Don Eberhart
11 F.3d 587 (Sixth Circuit, 1994)
Jenkins v. Hospital of Medical College of Pennsylvania
585 A.2d 1091 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Cucci v. Introcaso
527 A.2d 960 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Akau v. Olohana Corp.
652 P.2d 1130 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1982)
Remola Boykin v. The District of Columbia
689 F.2d 1092 (D.C. Circuit, 1982)
Mandel v. Myers
629 P.2d 935 (California Supreme Court, 1981)
Gibson v. Commonwealth
415 A.2d 80 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
United States v. Zenith Radio Corp.
562 F.2d 1209 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1977)
Kowall v. United States
53 F.R.D. 211 (W.D. Michigan, 1971)
Lufkin v. United States
168 F. Supp. 451 (D. New Hampshire, 1958)