Woodward v. State

942 So. 2d 922, 2006 WL 3040685
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 2006
Docket1D06-3836
StatusPublished

This text of 942 So. 2d 922 (Woodward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodward v. State, 942 So. 2d 922, 2006 WL 3040685 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

942 So.2d 922 (2006)

Larry WOODWARD, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D06-3836.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 27, 2006.

Larry Woodward, pro se, Petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See Munn v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
942 So. 2d 922, 2006 WL 3040685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.