Woodward v. State

151 So. 509, 113 Fla. 301, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1743
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 19, 1933·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Davis, C. J.

Plaintiff in error, George D. Woodward,, was convicted of the crime of incest with his twelve-year-old daughter, who is the plaintiff in error, Juanita Woodward. The brief of the Attorney General concedes the essential weakness of the State’s proof and a careful examination of the evidence by the members of this Court has convinced us that in view of the uncertainties appearing in the evidence, and the strong doubt which the evidence raises as to the defendants’ guilt of the revolting crime with which they were charged and found guilty, that the ends of justice will be subserved by the granting of a new trial. See Courson v. State, decided at the present term. Hammock v. State, 99 Fla. 1119, 128 Sou. Rep. 267; Fuller v. State, 92 Fla. 873, 110 Sou. Rep. 528; Council v. State, 111 Fla. 173, 149 Sou. Rep. 13; Calloway v. State, decided at the present term (opinion filed Nov. 10, 1933).

Reversed and a new trial awarded.

Whitfield, Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Buford, J., dissents.

Brown, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodward v. State, 151 So. 509, 113 Fla. 301, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1743 (Fla. 1933).

151 So. 509 (Woodward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
State v. Tibbs
370 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Williams v. State
168 So. 813 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Whitice v. State
169 So. 927 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Nipper v. State
169 So. 921 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Howell v. State
163 So. 691 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)