Williams v. State

168 So. 813, 127 Fla. 246, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1441
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 168 So. 813 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. State, 168 So. 813, 127 Fla. 246, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1441 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Buford, J.

In this case the plaintiff was convicted of murder in the first degree without recommendation to mercy.

The record fails to disclose substantial evidence of a premeditated design to effect the death of the person killed. It, therefore, app'ears that the ends of justice will be sub-served by reversing the judgment and remanding the cause for a new trial. See Courson v. State, 113 Fla. 123, 151 *247 Sou. 542; Woodward, et al., v. State, 113 Fla. 301, 151 Sou. 509, and cases there cited.

It is so ordered.

Reversed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell, J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion annd judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Courson v. State
151 So. 383 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Woodward v. State
151 So. 509 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 813, 127 Fla. 246, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-fla-1936.