Woodward v. Bruhwilder
This text of 1915 OK 1048 (Woodward v. Bruhwilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal was docketed in this court on May 16, 1914, and was submitted on December 6, 1915.
The plaintiff in error has filed no brief, nor asked for an extension of time within which to do so, nor given any explanation for his failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). The defendant in error has filed a motion, asking that the judgment be affirmed. This motion should be granted. Chamberlain v. Fearnow, 46 Okla. 101, 148 Pac. 138; Simmons v. Berryhill, 48 Okla. 98, 149 Pac. 1131.
We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1915 OK 1048, 153 P. 863, 54 Okla. 131, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-bruhwilder-okla-1915.