Woodward v. Bruhwilder

1915 OK 1048, 153 P. 863, 54 Okla. 131, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1283
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 14, 1915
Docket6421
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1915 OK 1048 (Woodward v. Bruhwilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodward v. Bruhwilder, 1915 OK 1048, 153 P. 863, 54 Okla. 131, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1283 (Okla. 1915).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was docketed in this court on May 16, 1914, and was submitted on December 6, 1915.

The plaintiff in error has filed no brief, nor asked for an extension of time within which to do so, nor given any explanation for his failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). The defendant in error has filed a motion, asking that the judgment be affirmed. This motion should be granted. Chamberlain v. Fearnow, 46 Okla. 101, 148 Pac. 138; Simmons v. Berryhill, 48 Okla. 98, 149 Pac. 1131.

We therefore recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tackett v. Bell
1924 OK 84 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Graham v. Kay
1923 OK 288 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1915 OK 1048, 153 P. 863, 54 Okla. 131, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-bruhwilder-okla-1915.