Chamberlin v. Fearnow

1915 OK 233, 148 P. 138, 46 Okla. 161, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1128
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 27, 1915·No. 4401·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DUDLEY, C.

The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on September 28, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson. v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

- By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chamberlin v. Fearnow, 1915 OK 233, 148 P. 138, 46 Okla. 161, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1128 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 233 (Chamberlin v. Fearnow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodward v. Bruhwilder
1915 OK 1048 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)