Woodson v. Criss

120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 269
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1954·No. No. 0-376·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner, appearing pro se, seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel respondent to set a petition [698]*698for writ of error coram nobis for hearing. The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court; No certified copies of pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject-matter accompany the petition, hence it does not comply; with- Rule 2-35 of this court. For-this reason the petition is dismissed'.'

' Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 2d 775.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodson v. Criss, 120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 269 (Ind. 1954).

120 N.E.2d 175 (Woodson v. Criss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC.
120 N.E.2d 175 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1954)