Woodson v. Criss

Indiana Supreme Court

Woodson v. Criss

120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 269

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 15, 1954

DocketNo. 0-376

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 N.E.2d 175 (Woodson v. Criss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodson v. Criss, 120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 269 (Ind. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner, appearing pro se, seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel respondent to set a petition [698]*698for writ of error coram nobis for hearing. The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court; No certified copies of pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject-matter accompany the petition, hence it does not comply; with- Rule 2-35 of this court. For-this reason the petition is dismissed'.'

' Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 2d 775.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

The petitioner, appearing pro se, seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel respondent to set a petition [698]*698for writ of error coram nobis for hearing. The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court; No certified copies of pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject-matter accompany the petition, hence it does not comply; with- Rule 2-35 of this court. For-this reason the petition is dismissed'.'

' Petition dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 2d 775.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodson-v-criss-ind-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack