Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC.
120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 268
Opinion
Petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus. The action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana, nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the lower court records. See State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall (1952), 231 Ind. 70, 106 N. E. 2d 796.
Petition denied.
Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 2d 175.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC., 120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 268 (Ind. 1954).
120 N.E.2d 175 (Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGill v. Rabb
151 N.E.2d 811 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)
Spangler v. Daily
151 N.E.2d 517 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)