Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC.
120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 268
This text of 120 N.E.2d 175 (Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Millbrooks v. PYLE, JUDGE, ETC., 120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 268 (Ind. 1954).
Opinion
Petitioner seeks an alternative writ of mandamus. The action is not brought in the name of the State of Indiana, nor does the petition comply with Rule 2-35 as to certified copies of the lower court records. See State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall (1952), 231 Ind. 70, 106 N. E. 2d 796.
Petition denied.
Note. — Reported in 120 N. E. 2d 175.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McGill v. Rabb
151 N.E.2d 811 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)
Spangler v. Daily
151 N.E.2d 517 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
120 N.E.2d 175, 233 Ind. 697, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/millbrooks-v-pyle-judge-etc-ind-1954.