Woods v. State
929 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8247, 2006 WL 1459822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Woods v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 879 So. 2d 651 →
Opinion
Tihlo Woods petitions for certiorari review of the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We treat the petition for certiorari as an appeal of a final order. See, e.g., Richardson v. State, 918 So.2d 999 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Finding that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was properly denied, we affirm. Id.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woods v. State, 929 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8247, 2006 WL 1459822 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
929 So. 2d 722 (Woods v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. State
918 So. 2d 999 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)