Woods v. State
929 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8247, 2006 WL 1459822
This text of 929 So. 2d 722 (Woods v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woods v. State, 929 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8247, 2006 WL 1459822 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
Tihlo Woods petitions for certiorari review of the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We treat the petition for certiorari as an appeal of a final order. See, e.g., Richardson v. State, 918 So.2d 999 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Finding that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was properly denied, we affirm. Id.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richardson v. State
918 So. 2d 999 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 722, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8247, 2006 WL 1459822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woods-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.