Woodlin v. Hon Co.
This text of 63 F. App'x 164 (Woodlin v. Hon Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Daniel P. Woodlin appeals the district court’s order denying his civil action alleg[165]*165ing employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woodlin v. Hon Co., No. CA-02-186-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 30, 2002).
AFFIRMED.
The district court's order dismissing the action was entered on the docket sheet on December 30, 2002. Contrary to the requirements of Fed.RXiv.P. 58, however, the court never entered its judgment in a separate document. As a result, the time limit for noting an appeal never began to run. See Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis, 435 U.S. 381, 384-85, 98 S.Ct. 1117, 55 L.Ed.2d 357 (1978). We accordingly deem the appeal timely.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodlin-v-hon-co-ca4-2003.