Woodhouse v. McCarthy

198 A.D.2d 909, 604 N.Y.S.2d 460
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiff may seek recoupment of payments for medical assistance by using remedies provided in article 10 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (see, Crabb v Estate of Mager, 66 AD2d 20; Matter of Rhodes, 148 Misc 2d 744; Bandas v Emperor, 121 Misc 2d 192). Dismissal of the action was not required because of plaintiff’s failure to name the estate of Edna McCarthy as a defendant. The proper remedy for nonjoinder, as Supreme Court determined, was to direct plaintiff to petition Surrogate’s Court for the appointment of a fiduciary to represent the estate so that the estate may be joined as a party (see, McLaughlin v McLaughlin, 155 [910] AD2d 418). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J. — Nonjoinder.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodhouse v. McCarthy, 198 A.D.2d 909, 604 N.Y.S.2d 460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 909 (Woodhouse v. McCarthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Ben Gruber Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 50400(U) (Putnam Surrogate's Court, 2025)