Woodford, Warden v. Payton
538 U.S. 975, 123 S. Ct. 1785
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 21, 2003
Docket02-1055
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases
This text of 538 U.S. 975 (Woodford, Warden v. Payton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woodford, Warden v. Payton, 538 U.S. 975, 123 S. Ct. 1785 (2003).
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Woodford v. Garceau, ante, p. 202.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Edrington CA4/2
California Court of Appeal, 2021
William Payton v. Ronald Davis
906 F.3d 812 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Brett Pensinger v. Kevin Chappell
787 F.3d 1014 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Payton v. Cullen
658 F.3d 890 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Mitchell Carlton Sims v. Jill Brown, Warden
425 F.3d 560 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Brown v. Payton
544 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Fernando Belmontes, Jr. v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, for the California State Prison at San Quentin
350 F.3d 861 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
William Charles Payton v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden, William Charles Payton v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden
346 F.3d 1204 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Saldano v. Cockrell
267 F. Supp. 2d 635 (E.D. Texas, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
538 U.S. 975, 123 S. Ct. 1785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodford-warden-v-payton-scotus-2003.