Woodcock v. Harton

200 So. 372, 146 Fla. 16
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 31, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal brings for review final decree of foreclosure and previous interlocutory orders in a suit to foreclose a State and county tax sale certificate.

No new or novel questions are presented.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment *17 in Pershing Hotel Co., Inc., v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26, 165 Sou. 897; Burns, et al., v. Campbell, 131 Fla. 630, 180 Sou. 46, and Inter-City Security Co., et al., v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671, 143 Sou. 791.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodcock v. Harton, 200 So. 372, 146 Fla. 16 (Fla. 1941).

200 So. 372 (Woodcock v. Harton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Pershing Hotel Co., Inc. v. Stark
165 So. 897 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Inter-City Security Co. v. Barbee
143 So. 791 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Burns, Et Vir v. Campbell
180 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)