Woodcock v. Harton

Supreme Court of Florida

Woodcock v. Harton

200 So. 372, 146 Fla. 16

DecidedJanuary 31, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 372 (Woodcock v. Harton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodcock v. Harton, 200 So. 372, 146 Fla. 16 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal brings for review final decree of foreclosure and previous interlocutory orders in a suit to foreclose a State and county tax sale certificate.

No new or novel questions are presented.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment *17 in Pershing Hotel Co., Inc., v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26, 165 Sou. 897; Burns, et al., v. Campbell, 131 Fla. 630, 180 Sou. 46, and Inter-City Security Co., et al., v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671, 143 Sou. 791.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal brings for review final decree of foreclosure and previous interlocutory orders in a suit to foreclose a State and county tax sale certificate.

No new or novel questions are presented.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment *17 in Pershing Hotel Co., Inc., v. Stark, 123 Fla. 26, 165 Sou. 897; Burns, et al., v. Campbell, 131 Fla. 630, 180 Sou. 46, and Inter-City Security Co., et al., v. Barbee, 106 Fla. 671, 143 Sou. 791.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Buford and Adams, J. J., concur'.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 372, 146 Fla. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodcock-v-harton-fla-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack