Inter-City Security Co. v. Barbee
143 So. 791, 106 Fla. 671
Opinions
This cause having heretofore been sub *672 mittecl to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises,- it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Inter-City Security Co. v. Barbee, 143 So. 791, 106 Fla. 671 (Fla. 1932).
143 So. 791 (Inter-City Security Co. v. Barbee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Addison v. Benedict
225 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Forman v. Ward
219 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Woodcock v. Harton
200 So. 372 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Hillsborough County v. Highway Engineering & Construction Co.
94 F.2d 419 (Fifth Circuit, 1938)
Nelson v. Lewis
173 So. 835 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Crawford v. Rehwinkel
174 So. 455 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Broadwater v. City of Tampashores
170 So. 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Brickell v. Palbicke
167 So. 44 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Cash, Et Vir. v. Drake Lumber Co.
163 So. 222 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Anderson, Et Ux. v. Northern Inv. Corp.
163 So. 134 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Ranger Realty Co. v. Hefty
152 So. 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)