Home/Court of Appeals of Kentucky/Woodall v. South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry Co.

Woodall v. South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry Co.

124 S.W. 843, 137 Ky. 512, 1910 Ky. LEXIS 550
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedFebruary 1, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 124 S.W. 843 (Woodall v. South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodall v. South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry Co., 124 S.W. 843, 137 Ky. 512, 1910 Ky. LEXIS 550 (Ky. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hobson.

— Affirming-

Prior to July, 1901, the South Covington & Cincinnati Railway Company owned and operated a [513]*513street car system in the city of Covington under valid franchises owned by it. The various routes on which the cars were operated all converged at the suspension bridge over which the cars passed to and from Cincinnati. They reached the bridge by tracks which passed over Scott and Greenup streets to Second, and over Second to the bridge. In 1901 the city desired to widen Court avenue, which is a street running directly south from the bridge; and a part of the ground required for the additional widening of •the street belonged to the railway company. An arrangement was then made between the city and the street railway company by which the company agreed to take up its tracks on Greenup and Scott streets and to come to the bridge along Park place and then along Court avenue. In other words, the tracks which before ran along Second street were placed along Park place and tracks were laid in Court avenue, and for these two squares Greenup street and Scott street were freed of the cars. The situation is shown on the following plot:

[514]*514

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. Phillips
171 S.W.2d 458 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1943)
Taylor v. Taylor
117 S.W.2d 983 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)
Scott v. Cincinnati, N. & C. Ry. Co.
105 S.W.2d 169 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1937)
Wilson v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins.
16 F. Supp. 200 (W.D. Kentucky, 1936)
City of Covington v. Cincinnati
71 F.2d 117 (Sixth Circuit, 1934)
Rose v. Sprague
59 S.W.2d 554 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)
Conservative Life Insurance Co. v. Hutchinson
52 S.W.2d 709 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Bearden v. Texas Co.
41 S.W.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Schweitzer's Trustee v. Schweitzer
35 S.W.2d 3 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)
Russell v. Kentucky Utilities Company
22 S.W.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
Brown v. Brown
152 P. 646 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1915)
Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Calhoun
151 S.W. 659 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 S.W. 843, 137 Ky. 512, 1910 Ky. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodall-v-south-cov-cin-st-ry-co-kyctapp-1910.