Wood v. Wood

865 P.2d 616, 1993 Wyo. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 518321
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 17, 1993
Docket93-67
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 865 P.2d 616 (Wood v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. Wood, 865 P.2d 616, 1993 Wyo. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 518321 (Wyo. 1993).

Opinions

TAYLOR, Justice.

This appeal, from an unreported hearing, follows a decision adverse to appellant in a dispute over allegedly delinquent child support payments. We dismiss because of the failure to settle the record on appeal as required by the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Appellant, Margaret Mary Wood (Margaret), filed a petition on October 1, 1992 seeking to hold her former husband, appellee, Ernest Lee Wood (Ernest), in contempt of court for allegedly being delinquent in the payment of $7,400.00 for child support. The district court conducted a hearing and found that Margaret had failed to prove her allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. The hearing was unreported.

Margaret brought this appeal claiming error in the allocation of the burden of proof at the hearing. In an attempt to create a record on appeal, Margaret filed a “Statement of Evidence and Proceedings” under W.R.A.P. 3.03. The statement included an account of testimony at the hearing and documents, some of which had apparently been received into evidence. Ernest filed a number of proposed amendments to the statement of evidence.

The record on appeal is fundamental to the exercise of appellate review because this court does not act as a fact finder. Gifford v. Casper Neon Sign Co., Inc., 618 P.2d 547, 551 (Wyo.1980). See W.R.A.P. 3.01 (defining contents of record on appeal). When a proceeding is reported and transcribed, the appellant may assert error in the findings or conclusions of the district court. W.R.A.P. 3.02. The Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure specify a means of providing a record on appeal to support claims of error when a proceeding is unreported:

If no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable, appellant may prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best available means including appellant’s recollection. The statement shall be served on appellee, who may serve objections or propose amendments within 15 days after service. The statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the trial court for settlement and approval and as settled and approved shall be included by the clerk of the trial court in the record on appeal.

W.R.A.P. 3.03 (emphasis added).

Appellant bears the burden to bring a sufficient record to this court upon which a decision can be based. Scherling v. Kilgore, 599 P.2d 1352, 1357 (Wyo.1979). Appellant has failed in this instance to follow the dictates of our procedure. The statement of evidence and the proposed amendments offered by the parties were not settled and approved and included in the record on appeal. W.R.A.P. 3.03.

[618]*618Without a settled record of the proceedings at the hearing, we are unable to consider this appeal and order it dismissed. Korkow v. Markle, 746 P.2d 434, 435 (Wyo.1987); Sharp v. Sharp, 671 P.2d 317, 318 (Wyo.1983); Matter of Parental Rights of SCN, 659 P.2d 568, 572 (Wyo.1983).

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Debyah v. State ex rel. Department of workforce Services
2015 WY 94 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2015)
Zeitner v. Shank
2012 WY 157 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2012)
Steiger v. HAPPY VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
2010 WY 158 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2010)
Seherr-Thoss v. Seherr-Thoss
2006 WY 111 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2006)
TW v. BM
2006 WY 68 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2006)
Harshberger v. Harshberger
2005 WY 99 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2005)
Carroll v. Law
2005 WY 44 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2005)
Beeman v. Beeman
2005 WY 45 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2005)
Vernier v. Vernier
2004 WY 77 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2004)
Yates v. Yates
2003 WY 161 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2003)
In Re Estate of George
2003 WY 129 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2003)
Smith v. Smith
2003 WY 87 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2003)
Burt v. Burt
2002 WY 127 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2002)
Erhart v. Evans
2001 WY 79 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2001)
Thomas v. Thomas
983 P.2d 717 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1999)
Munoz v. Munoz
919 P.2d 138 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1996)
Stadtfeld v. Stadtfeld
920 P.2d 662 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1996)
Wood v. Wood
865 P.2d 616 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 P.2d 616, 1993 Wyo. LEXIS 186, 1993 WL 518321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-wood-wyo-1993.