Wood v. United States
93 F.2d 1023, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3710
Opinion
The law and facts of this cause having been submitted to the trial court without a jury, and the appellant not having made any request for specific findings of fact or law, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed on the authority of Rose v. United States, 6 Cir., 69 F.2d 966, Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas, 6 Cir., 30 F.2d 97, and Fleischmann Const. Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S.Ct. 284, 70 L.Ed. 624.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wood v. United States, 93 F.2d 1023, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3710 (6th Cir. 1938).
93 F.2d 1023 (Wood v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Forsberg
270 U.S. 349 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Thomas E. Basham Co. v. Lucas
30 F.2d 97 (Sixth Circuit, 1928)
Rose v. United States
69 F.2d 966 (Sixth Circuit, 1934)