Wood v. Stoddard
2 Johns. 194
Opinion
The relaxation of the rule, as to questions of interest, has never been extended to jurors. They must be omni exceptione mayores ; free from every objection, and wholly disinterested. The judgment be- . low must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wood v. Stoddard, 2 Johns. 194 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1807).
2 Johns. 194 (Wood v. Stoddard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Wood
299 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1936)
County of Orange v. Storm King Stone Co.
191 A.D. 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Opinion of the Justices
72 A. 754 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1909)
City of Guthrie v. Shaffer
1898 OK 39 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1898)
City of Dallas v. Peacock
33 S.W. 220 (Texas Supreme Court, 1895)
Gibson v. City of Wyandotte
20 Kan. 156 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1878)
Hearn v. City of Greensburgh
51 Ind. 119 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)
City of Portland v. Kamm
5 Or. 362 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1874)
Burdine v. Grand Lodge of Alabama
37 Ala. 478 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1861)
Page v. Contoocook Valley Railroad
21 N.H. 438 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1850)
Mayor of Columbus v. Goetchius
7 Ga. 139 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1849)
Glover v. Woolsey
1 Dudley Rep. 85 (Richmond Superior Court, Ga., 1832)
Lewis v. Few
1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 102 (New York Supreme Court, 1808)