Wood v. State
This text of 109 S.W.2d 756 (Wood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conviction for violating the provisions of the Texas Liquor Control Act; punishment, a fine of $100.00.
The complaints of the insufficience of the information because same does not negative the exceptions in the statute, and of the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury regarding the matter of the inspectors being accomplice witnesses, — which seem to be the only material questions raised, — are both decided against appellant in the case of Baker v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 308, in regard to first question raised, and as to the other, Stevens v. State, No. 18823, opinion handed down October 13, 1937 (page 333 of this volume).
Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 S.W.2d 756, 133 Tex. Crim. 176, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.