Wood v. State

109 S.W.2d 756, 133 Tex. Crim. 176, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 482
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 20, 1937·No. No. 18976.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge. —

Conviction for violating the provisions of the Texas Liquor Control Act; punishment, a fine of $100.00.

The complaints of the insufficience of the information because same does not negative the exceptions in the statute, and of the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury regarding the matter of the inspectors being accomplice witnesses, — which seem to be the only material questions raised, — are both decided against appellant in the case of Baker v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 308, in regard to first question raised, and as to the other, Stevens v. State, No. 18823, opinion handed down October 13, 1937 (page 333 of this volume).

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. State, 109 S.W.2d 756, 133 Tex. Crim. 176, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 482 (Tex. 1937).

109 S.W.2d 756 (Wood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hebert v. State
114 S.W.2d 549 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Thomas v. State
114 S.W.2d 562 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)